Mike Pompeo's secret trip to North Korea makes zero sense
What was he sent to accomplish?
The word of the day is: "Kremlinology."
The term comes from the Cold War era, and refers to the difficulties analysts encountered in trying to interpret political developments within the Soviet Union. Who's in? Who's out? Were major policy changes in the works? Was a recent diplomatic position a bluff? Or was it in earnest?
Democratic governments can try to hold their cards close to their vests, but the existence of opposition parties forces the government to articulate some position before the press and the voters, which observers can assume has some bearing on its actual views. Kremlin-watchers had to read between the lines, seeking coded information in the order in which articles appeared in Pravda, or placement in reviewing stands of parades.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
But when a democratic government behaves in a sufficiently opaque and confusing manner, its own citizens have to start reading it like a Soviet-era Politburo. Which brings us to Mike Pompeo's mission to North Korea.
The Trump administration's policy on North Korea has been mass of contradictions, threatening "fire and fury" one day and offering peace on the next. The president mocked his own secretary of state, Rex Tillerson at the time, for trying to negotiate with "Little Rocket Man," but then expressed a willingness to meet the North Korean leader in person, something no previous American president has done. He has called for complete denuclearization as a precondition for talks, but at one point appeared to have confirmed that direct talks had already begun without preconditions (a statement he later walked back). It's in this confusing context that Trump sent one of the few members of his foreign policy team that he trusts as an advance man to prepare for a summit.
But why did Pompeo go to Pyongyang? What was he sent to accomplish? His mission was conducted in secret; he didn't even reveal the plans to those senators responsible for oversight of foreign policy. He went as the outgoing head of the CIA and the not-yet-confirmed secretary of state; his authority, inasmuch as he had any, was not institutional but personal, as someone with the president's ear. He came back from the highest-level talks since 2000 with no concessions and no progress on releasing American citizens held by the Kim regime. And upon his return, the president trumpeted the incredible progress that had been made in U.S.-North Korean relations.
Secrecy befits the quest for a difficult diplomatic breakthrough. But if a breakthrough is what was sought, then there'd be little reason to announce the mission after the first high-level overture — particularly when there are no concrete results to be demonstrated. And while sending someone who has the personal confidence of the president but is not an official American diplomat makes sense if you want to feel out the other side while retaining deniability regarding any proposals that individual might make, if that individual has already been announced as the president's choice to serve as top diplomat, he'd logically be an even weaker negotiating partner than either a confirmed secretary or an outsider, because he'd still have to face a difficult grilling before the Senate that might reveal sensitive points in an ongoing negotiation.
Was the Senate perhaps the real target of the mission? Pompeo was hardly assured of confirmation before. But now, rejecting him might be interpreted to be a rejection of diplomacy with North Korea. Might that move some votes into his column? Or might it provoke the opposite response, nervousness on the part of hawks coupled with anger from senators who expect to be kept more appropriately in the loop?
It's extremely hard to answer any questions about the purpose of his trip when we don't know what Trump himself would view as a "win" from negotiations with North Korea. Based on his performance in domestic negotiations with Congress, he might well count any piece of paper with his signature on it as a win. If that's the case, then the South Koreans, who are desperate to avoid conflict on the peninsula while also anxious to keep a volatile American government on-side, have both the incentive and the opportunity to facilitate a deal to their liking. That could be a very hopeful sign for Korean peace; "go big or go home" might well mean larger American concessions than have ever been contemplated. But Trump might sign such a deal and denounce it the next day as something he never should have done. Or negotiations might be going nowhere, and the trip might have been Pompeo's way of manipulating negotiations toward a standstill, the better to lay the groundwork for military action.
We really have no way of knowing. So we look at Twitter, our version of dàzìbào, and hope there's method somewhere behind the madness.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Noah Millman is a screenwriter and filmmaker, a political columnist and a critic. From 2012 through 2017 he was a senior editor and featured blogger at The American Conservative. His work has also appeared in The New York Times Book Review, Politico, USA Today, The New Republic, The Weekly Standard, Foreign Policy, Modern Age, First Things, and the Jewish Review of Books, among other publications. Noah lives in Brooklyn with his wife and son.
-
Bankman-Fried gets 25 years for fraud
Speed Read Former "crypto king" Sam Bankman-Fried will report to federal prison
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
'His story should be here'
Today's Newspapers A roundup of the headlines from the US front pages
By The Week Staff Published
-
'Not cross buns': the row over recipe revamps
Talking Point New versions of the Easter favourite have sparked controversy but sales are soaring
By Adrienne Wyper, The Week UK Published
-
Puffed rice and yoga: inside the collapsed tunnel where Indian workers await rescue
Speed Read Workers trapped in collapsed tunnel are suffering from dysentery and anxiety over their rescue
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Gaza hospital blast: What the video evidence shows about who's to blame
Speed Read Nobody wants to take responsibility for the deadly explosion in the courtyard of Gaza's al-Ahli Hospital. Roll the tape.
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Giraffe poo seized after woman wanted to use it to make a necklace
Tall Tales And other stories from the stranger side of life
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Helicopter sound arouses crocodiles
Tall Tales And other stories from the stranger side of life
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Woman sues Disney over 'injurious wedgie'
Tall Tales And other stories from the stranger side of life
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Emotional support alligator turned away from baseball stadium
Tall Tales And other stories from the stranger side of life
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Europe's oldest shoes found in Spanish caves
Tall Tales And other stories from the stranger side of life
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Artworks stolen by Nazis returned to heirs of cabaret performer
It wasn't all bad Good news stories from the past seven days
By The Week Staff Published